Pediatric Distal Tibial Physeal Injuries and Their Role in Premature Physeal Arrest: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study

Yasin Erdoğan, Ali Said Nazlıgül, Şahan Güven, Tural Talibli, Erkan Akgün, Enejd Veizi

Volume 8 · Issue 1 · pp. 35–40

Received: 20250103  Accepted: 20250225  Published: 20250319

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the impact of factors such as fracture type, initial displacement, reduction method, associated fibular fractures, and trauma mechanism on the occurrence of premature physeal arrest in pediatric distal tibial physeal fractures. Methods: This retrospective study included 83 pediatric patients who underwent surgical treatment for distal tibial physeal fractures between 2019 and 2024 at two centers. Data on fracture type (Salter-Harris classification, McFarland, tillaux, triplanar), reduction method (open/closed), fixation technique, and mechanism of injury were analyzed. Angular deformities were assessed using lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA) and anterior distal tibial angle (ADTA). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software, with significance set at p<0.05. Results: The cohort included 59 males (71%) and 24 females (29%) with a mean age of 12 years. Premature physeal closure was observed in 10 patients (12%), with higher rates in Salter-Harris type 4 (50%) and McFarland fractures (50%). One McFarland fracture resulted in varus deformity, necessitating corrective osteotomy. Among all distal tibial fractures, traffic accident-related injuries were significantly associated with higher rates of physeal arrest. The incidence of premature closure in triplanar and Tillaux fractures was 4.5% and 12.5%, respectively, consistent with literature data. Conclusion: Salter-Harris type 4 and McFarland fractures, as well as high-energy trauma, are significant risk factors for premature physeal arrest. Patient education and close follow-up are critical for early detection and management of complications. Prospective, randomized studies are warranted to further elucidate these findings.

Keywords: Pediatric, distal tibial fracture, physeal injury, lateral distal tibial angle, anterior distal tibial angle

Introduction

Pediatric distal tibial physeal fractures are the most common injuries following distal radius and phalangeal physeal fractures 1. They account for approximately 11-20% of all physeal fractures 2,3. Inadequate reduction and joint incongruity may lead to premature physeal closure and deformities 4. The rates of premature physeal closure following pediatric distal tibial physeal fractures can reach up to 38% 5.

During the rapid growth phase of childhood, the distal tibial physis contributes approximately 5 mm of longitudinal growth per year 6. Angular deformities and limb length discrepancies may manifest 1 to 2 years following a physeal injury 7.

There is evidence in the literature suggesting that factors such as the Salter-Harris (SH) classification of the fracture, the degree of initial displacement, the magnitude of the physeal gap following surgical intervention, the presence of an associated fibular fracture, and the timing of surgical treatment are significantly correlated with the risk of premature physeal closure 1,2,8. It has been reported that Salter-Harris type I and II fractures, as well as achieving anatomic reduction, are associated with a reduced risk of premature physeal closure 5.

The literature includes multiple publications examining the relationship between Salter-Harris fracture types and premature physeal closure. However, no studies have comprehensively analyzed Triplane, McFarland, Tillaux, and other Salter-Harris fracture types together.

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of initial post-reduction displacement, Salter-Harris (SH) fracture type, the method of reduction, the presence of an associated fibular fracture, and the mechanism of trauma on the occurrence of physeal arrest. Our hypothesis was that the risk of premature physeal closure increases with higher Salter-Harris classifications and greater injury energy.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study was conducted following approval from the Local Ethics Committee (approval number: AEŞH-BADEK-2024-450). Two different centers were included in our study: Ankara Bilkent City Hospital between March 2019- March 2024 and Ankara Etlik City Hospital November 2022-March 2024 Orthopedics and Traumatology Clinic between March 2019-March 2024. The centers included in this study are designated advanced trauma centers, with comparable surgical equipment and a similar level of surgical expertise across all institutions. The study included patients who underwent surgery for pediatric distal tibial fractures involving physics. Patients who were postoperative for at least 6 months and had complete preoperative and postoperative radiological and clinical data were included in the study. Patients with open fractures, patients with pathological fractures, patients with fractures in more than one extremity, and patients who were followed conservatively with a cast were excluded from the study.

Data such as age, gender, affected side, fracture type (Salter-Harris classification, McFarland fracture, Tillaux ,Triplane fracture), amount of displacement after initial reduction, presence of fibula fracture, open or closed reduction, fixation method, mechanism of injury (falling, sports injury, traffic accident), Lateral Distal Tibial Angle (LDTA) and Anterior Distal Tibial Angle (ADTA) at last follow-up were extracted from the database.

Radiographic measurements were conducted using the Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). Radiological measurements were made by an experienced orthopedic surgeon. Angular deformity of the ankle was measured using a line drawn parallel to the tibial plafond and a second line drawn parallel to the tibial shaft based on AP and lateral radiographs (Figure 1) 9.

2.1. Statistical analysis

SPSS version 21.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was utilized for statistical analysis. The normality of variable distributions was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests, as well as Q-Q plots and histograms. Variables with normal distributions were presented as mean ± standard deviation, while non-normally distributed variables were reported as median (minimum-maximum) values. Categorical data were expressed as frequency (percentage).

For comparisons, the Pearson Chi-square test was employed for categorical variables with sufficient observations, while Fisher’s Exact test was used for those with insufficient observations. Post hoc analyses for statistically significant results involving more than two categories were conducted using the Bonferroni method. For continuous variables, Student's t-test was applied to compare two independent groups with normal distributions, whereas the Mann-Whitney U test was used for non-normally distributed variables. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Measurement of angular deformity patients

A. Line drawn parallel to the tibial plafond on the anteroposterior radiograph, B. Line drawn along the tibial medullary axis on the anteroposterior radiograph, C. Line drawn parallel to the tibial plafond on the lateral radiograph, D. Line drawn along the tibial medullary axis on the lateral radiograph.

Postoperative radiographies

A. Early postoperative anteroposterior radiograph, B. Early postoperative lateral radiograph, C. 6th-month postoperative anteroposterior radiograph, D. 6th-month postoperative lateral radiograph, E. 6th-month postoperative limb length radiograph

Results

A total of 83 patients, comprising 59 males (71%) and 24 females (29%), were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 12 years (8–15 years). Among the cases, 42 patients (50.7%) underwent surgery on the right side, while 41 patients (49.3%) had surgery on the left side.

Among the patients, 4 (4.8%) were diagnosed with McFarland fractures, 27 (32.5%) with Salter-Harris (SH) type 2 fractures, 15 (18%) with SH type 3 fractures, 6 (7.2%) with SH type 4 fractures, 8 (9.6%) with Tillaux fractures, and 23 (27.7%) with triplanar fractures (Table 1). During surgery, a closed reduction was performed in 70 patients (84.4%), while open reduction was performed in 13 patients (15.6%). Fixation methods included cannulated screws in 56 patients (64.7%), K-wires in 25 patients (30.1%), and a combination of both K-wires and cannulated screws in 2 patients (2.4%) (Table 1).

Premature physeal closure was observed in 10 patients (12%). Among six patients with SH type 4 fractures, three experienced physeal closure. Additionally, two out of four patients with McFarland fractures developed premature physeal closure, and one of these cases progressed to varus deformity. The patient with varus deformity underwent corrective osteotomy at the sixth month post-injury. Analysis of the mechanism of injury revealed that fractures resulting from traffic accidents were significantly associated with an increased incidence of premature physeal closure (Table 2).

It was determined that the amount of residual displacement after the initial reduction and the presence of an associated fibular fracture had no significant effect on the incidence of premature physeal closure (Table 2).

The mean lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA) and anterior distal tibial angle (ADTA) values for the patients were within normal limits, except for one patient. In a patient with a McFarland fracture, the LDTA was measured at 104°, indicating the presence of varus deformity (Figure 2). Notably, the ADTA values were found to be within normal limits in all patients, including the patient with varus deformity (Table 3).

Summary of Patient Data for Patients

Table 1

n=831
Gender Male 59 (71.0%)
Gender Female 24 (29.0%)
Age (years) Age (years) 12 (8-16)
Side L 41 (49.3%)
Side R 42 (50.7%)
Fracture Type McFarland 4 (4.8%)
Fracture Type SH-Type 2 27 (32.5%)
Fracture Type SH-Type 3 15 (18.0%)
Fracture Type SH-Type 4 6 (7.2%)
Fracture Type Tillaux 8 (9.6%)
Fracture Type Triplanar 23 (27.7%)
Surgery Cannulated Screw 56 (67.4%)
Surgery K-wire 25 (30.1%)
Surgery Both 2 (2.4%)
Post-Reduction Displacement (mm) Post-Reduction Displacement (mm) 2.4 (1.0-9.2)
Physis closed Open 73 (88%)
Physis closed Closed 10 (12%)
Reduction Methods Open 13(15.6%)
Reduction Methods Closed 70 (84.4%)
Fibula Fracture Yes 14 (16.8%)
Fibula Fracture no 69 (83.1%)
Last Follow-up LDTA (degrees) Last Follow-up LDTA (degrees) 89 (88-104)
Last Follow-up ADTA Last Follow-up ADTA 80 (78-84)
Injury Mechanism Fall 37 (44.5%)
Injury Mechanism Sports injury 36 (43.3%)
Injury Mechanism Traffic accident 10 (12%)

1:n (%), median(min.-max.)

ADTA: Anterior Distal Tibial Angle

LDTA: Lateral Distal Tibial Angle

The data of patients between premature physeal closure group and open physis group

Table 2

Open Physis, N=731 Premature Physeal Closure, N=101 p
Gender Male 52 (71.2%) 7 (70%) >0.9992
Gender Female 21 (28.7%) 3 (30%) >0.9992
Age (years) Age (years) 12 (8-15) 13 (9-15) 0.6843
Side Left 34 (46.5%) 7 (70%) 0.0852
Side Right 39 (53.5%) 3 (20%) 0.0852
Fracture Type McFarland 2 (2.7%) 2 (20%) 0.0152
Fracture Type SH type 2 26 (35.6%) 1 (10%) 0.0152
Fracture Type SH type 3 15(20.5%) 2 (20%) 0.0152
Fracture Type SH type 4 3 (4.1%) 3 (30%) 0.0152
Fracture Type Tillaux 7 (9.5%) 1(10%) 0.0152
Fracture Type Triplane 21 (28.7%) 1 (10%) 0.0152
Post-Reduction Displacement (mm) Post-Reduction Displacement (mm) 2.4 (1.0-9.2) 2.5 (1.6-5.1) 0.6193
Reduction Open 8 (10.9%) 4 (40%) 0.0542
Reduction Close 65 (89.0%) 6 (60%) 0.0542
Fibula Fracture Yes 10 (13.6%) 4 (40%) 0.0762
Fibula Fracture No 63 (86.4%) 6 (60%) 0.0762
Last Follow-Up LDTA (degrees) Last Follow-Up LDTA (degrees) 89 (88-90) 89 (88-104) 0.8373
Last Follow-Up ADTA (degrees) Last Follow-Up ADTA (degrees) 80 (78-84) 82 (80-84) 0.1073
Trauma Mechanism Fall 36 (49.3%) 2 (20%) 0.0152
Trauma Mechanism Sports injury 33 (45.2%) 4 (40%) 0.0152
Trauma Mechanism Traffic accident 4 (5.4%) 4 (30%) 0.0152

1: n(%); Median (min.-max.), 2: Fisher exact Test, 3: Mann-Whitney U Test

The data of patients in premature physeal closure group

Table 3

No Gender Age (Years) Side Fracture Type Surgery Initially Displacement Reduction Type Fibula Fracture Deformity Last Follow-up LDTA (°) Last Follow-up ADTA (°) Trauma Mechanism
1 Male 14 L Triplanar Cannulated screw 2.5 Close Yes No 89 82 Fall
2 Female 10 L McFarland Cannulated screw 2.5 Open No No 91 84 Sports Injury
3 Male 14 L Tillaux Cannulated screw 4.8 Open No No 89 82 Fall
4 Male 13 R SH Type 2 Cannulated screw 1.8 Close No No 89 81 Traffic Accident
5 Male 14 L SH Type 3 Cannulated screw 2.2 Close Yes No 88 83 Sports Injury
6 Male 9 L SH Type 3 K-wire 1.6 Close No No 89 80 Fall
7 Male 15 L SH Type 4 Cannulated screw 5.1 Open No No 89 80 Sports Injury
8 Male 11 L SH Type 4 Cannulated screw 3.5 Close Yes No 89 80 Traffic Accident
9 Male 13 R SH Type 4 K-wire 2.4 Close No No 88 82 Sports Injury
10 Female 12 R McFarland K-wire and cannulated screw 2.2 Open No Yes 104 82 Traffic Accident

Discussion

The most significant finding of our study is that Salter-Harris type 4 fractures and McFarland fractures are associated with a significantly higher incidence of premature physeal arrest. Another key result is that injuries resulting from traffic accidents are more frequently associated with premature physeal arrest compared to those caused by simple falls or sports-related injuries.

Several risk factors contribute to premature physeal arrest following pediatric distal tibial physeal fractures, including the type of fracture, mechanism of injury, initial displacement, number of reduction attempts, quality of reduction, and patient age. In a study conducted by Rohmiller et al.10, growth disturbances of the physis were observed in 39.6% of cases involving Salter-Harris (SH) type 1 and type 2 fractures. In a study conducted by Barmada et al., premature physeal arrest was most commonly observed in Salter-Harris (SH) type 3 and type 4 fractures. Additionally, SH type 1 and type 2 fractures were identified as the second most frequent types associated with physeal arrest 5. In various studies, differing results have been reported due to the heterogeneity of study groups and a predominant focus on fracture classification rather than the mechanism of injury. Similarly, in our study, premature physeal arrest was most frequently observed in Salter-Harris (SH) type 4 fractures.

The fractures referred to as McFarland fractures, involving the medial malleolus, can be classified as Salter-Harris (SH) type 4 or type 5 fractures 8. It has been reported that physeal bar formation can occur in up to 50% of McFarland fractures 1,8,11. In a study conducted by Petratos et al.8, the incidence of premature physeal arrest in McFarland fractures was reported to be 35%. In our study, both McFarland fractures were classified as SH type 4 fractures, and the observed physeal bar formation was consistent with the literature. Among all distal tibial fractures involving the physis in our study, only one McFarland fracture resulted in a varus deformity requiring surgical correction. This patient underwent corrective osteotomy at the sixth month post-injury.

In older pediatric populations, triplanar and Tillaux fractures are typically associated with a low risk of premature epiphyseal plate closure5. The literature reports a frequency of premature epiphyseal closure in triplanar fractures ranging between 4% and 21% 5,12. In our study, the incidence of premature epiphyseal closure in triplanar fractures was found to be 4.5%, which is consistent with the reported range in the literature. Although premature physeal closure has not been reported in the literature following Tillaux fractures, in our study, physeal arrest was observed in 12.5% of Tillaux fractures 13. This high rate is thought to be attributable to the small sample size in this group and the relatively lower average age of the patients.

Several studies have highlighted a significant association between the mechanism of injury and the occurrence of premature epiphyseal arrest. Rohmiller et al.10 reported that pronation-abduction type injuries are more frequently linked to premature physeal arrest compared to supination-external rotation type injuries. Furthermore, it has been proposed that the energy magnitude of the trauma plays a significant role in determining the likelihood of premature physeal arrest14. Physeal arrest was observed more frequently in patients with fractures resulting from traffic accidents. We hypothesize that the likelihood of premature physeal arrest increases with the energy level of the trauma.

The retrospective nature of our study and the relatively small sample size represent its primary limitations. However, the inclusion of diverse fracture types, such as Salter-Harris, triplanar, McFarland, and Tillaux fractures, and the comparative analysis of these groups are considered valuable contributions to the existing literature. Nevertheless, further prospective, randomized studies are needed to provide more robust evidence on this topic.

Conclusion

High-energy trauma, Salter-Harris type 4 fractures, and McFarland fractures are significant risk factors for premature physeal arrest. In this context, it is crucial to inform the parents of the affected children about these risks and emphasize the importance of close follow-up in these cases to monitor for potential complications.

Statement of ethics

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ankara Etlik City Hospital Ethics Committee (2024-450) The study was performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Source of Finance

The authors declare that they have received no financial support for this study

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting the conclusion of this article will be available by the authors without undue reservation.

Author contributions

Concept: YE/ASN, Design: ASN/ŞG/TT, Literature search: YE/EV/EA/TT, Data Collection and Processing: ASN/ŞG/EA, Analysis or Interpretation: TT/EV/ŞG, Writing: YE/ASN/EV

References

  1. Abbot MD, Siebert MJ, Wimberly RL, Wilson PL, Riccio AI. Physeal Bar Formation After Pediatric Medial Malleolus Fractures. Orthopedics. Jan-Feb 2024;47(1):e33-e37.
  2. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20230616-03
  3. O WH, Craig C, Banks HH. Epiphyseal injuries. Pediatr Clin North Am. May 1974;21(2):407-22.
  4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3955(16)32998-4
  5. Stefanich RJ, Lozman J. The juvenile fracture of Tillaux. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Sep 1986;(210):219-27.
  6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198609000-00032
  7. Nenopoulos A, Beslikas T, Gigis I, Sayegh F, Christoforidis I, Hatzokos I. The role of CT in diagnosis and treatment of distal tibial fractures with intra-articular involvement in children. Injury. Nov 2015;46(11):2177-80.
  8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.07.017
  9. Barmada A, Gaynor T, Mubarak SJ. Premature physeal closure following distal tibia physeal fractures: a new radiographic predictor. J Pediatr Orthop. Nov-Dec 2003;23(6):733-9.
  10. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004694-200311000-00010
  11. de Sanctis N, Della Corte S, Pempinello C. Distal tibial and fibular epiphyseal fractures in children: prognostic criteria and long-term results in 158 patients. J Pediatr Orthop B. Jan 2000;9(1):40-4.
  12. https://doi.org/10.1097/01202412-200001000-00008
  13. Chen H, Chen Z, Chen P, Zheng Z, Lin J. Incidence of growth disturbance after distal tibia physeal fracture in children. J Orthop Surg Res. Dec 8 2022;17(1):529.
  14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03427-4
  15. Petratos DV, Kokkinakis M, Ballas EG, Anastasopoulos JN. Prognostic factors for premature growth plate arrest as a complication of the surgical treatment of fractures of the medial malleolus in children. Bone Joint J. Mar 2013;95-B(3):419-23.
  16. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B3.29410
  17. Ahn TK, Yi Y, Cho JH, Lee WC. A cohort study of patients undergoing distal tibial osteotomy without fibular osteotomy for medial ankle arthritis with mortise widening. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Mar 4 2015;97(5):381-8. doi:10.2106/JBJS.M.01360
  18. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.01360
  19. Rohmiller MT, Gaynor TP, Pawelek J, Mubarak SJ. Salter-Harris I and II fractures of the distal tibia: does mechanism of injury relate to premature physeal closure? J Pediatr Orthop. May-Jun 2006;26(3):322-8.
  20. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bpo.0000217714.80233.0b
  21. Seel EH, Noble S, Clarke NM, Uglow MG. Outcome of distal tibial physeal injuries. J Pediatr Orthop B. Jul 2011;20(4):242-8.
  22. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0b013e3283467202
  23. Schurz M, Binder H, Platzer P, Schulz M, Hajdu S, Vecsei V. Physeal injuries of the distal tibia: long-term results in 376 patients. Int Orthop. Apr 2010;34(4):547-52. -9
  24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0851-9
  25. Jalkanen J, Sinikumpu JJ, Puhakka J, et al. Physeal Fractures of Distal Tibia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Pediatr Orthop. Aug 1 2021;41(7):e506-e511.
  26. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000001833
  27. Dugan G, Herndon WA, McGuire R. Distal tibial physeal injuries in children: a different treatment concept. J Orthop Trauma. 1987;1(1):63-7.
  28. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-198701010-00010

Cite this article

Yasin Erdoğan, Ali Said Nazlıgül, Şahan Güven, Tural Talibli, Erkan Akgün, Enejd Veizi. Pediatric Distal Tibial Physeal Injuries and Their Role in Premature Physeal Arrest: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study. Journal of Cukurova Anesthesia and Surgical Sciences. 8(1):35-40. https://doi.org/10.36516/jocass.1611840

Scroll to Top